by Lim Soon Hock
A critical book review of Peter Rowan’s Proclaiming the Peacemaker: Malaysian Church as an Agent of Reconciliation in a Multicultural Society (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2012).
The book review was an assignment for a course on Christian Theology, Culture and Church which I did as part of my DMin studies in 2022. Please forgive me for the academic style in which it is written. I hope reading my review will whet your appetite to read the book yourself.
Thesis of the Book
Proclaiming the Peacemaker is about the church’s mission to proclaim Jesus as the Peacemaker and to act as an agent of reconciliation.1
It includes both vertical reconciliation with God and horizontal reconciliation with people2 (and ultimately with all things).3
The church’s effectiveness to fulfil the mission is predicated on its self-identity4 and readiness to suffer.5 Rowan’s thesis is discussed in the context of the multicultural but divided society of Malaysia.6 The author has a personal interest in the subject because of his life-experience in Northern Ireland where society is deeply divided.7
Secondly, he had lived and worked in Malaysia for about ten years as a seminarian, and had seen the relevance of the subject for Malaysia.8
Critical Review of Issues Raised in the Book
- The Theology of Mission and Reconciliation
In Chapter 1, the author concludes that reconciliation is a central theme in the New Testament9 that has both vertical and horizontal dimensions; with God and man respectively.10 He contends that theologians and missiologists have tended to emphasise on the former but failed to explore the latter.11
He explicates the foregoing with relevant Scripture,12 especially, from the Pauline epistles.13 His study of terms, such as “peace,” “forgiveness,” and “salvation,” further underscores their connectedness with “reconciliation.”14
Rowan states that reconciliation with God must necessarily mean reconciliation with people.15 His point is supported by public theologians, such as Paul S. Chung.16
Reconciliation, then, is first, vertically with God, and second, horizontally with His people. In Ephesians 2:14-18, Paul teaches that peace between Jewish and Gentile believers is only made possible because what used to be two peoples have become one new man in Christ.17 Hence, while peacemaking by Christians with non-Christians may be attempted, it may not, however, be easily achieved; simply because the primary vertical reconciliation with God is missing in one party.
The author, quoting Howard Marshall, is aware of the difficulty.18 Marshall’s answer is for Christians to acknowledge their shortcomings in promoting reconciliation, to repent of their hostile attitudes and actions toward others, to speak out against revenge, to know that they have the gospel of peace that the world needs, and to know that there are non-Christians who value reconciliation.19
Nonetheless, the reviewer maintains that in the context of Malaysia’s cultural diversity and dominance of Islam, the pursuit of reconciliation without compromising the gospel is challenging.

The second piece of the framework is the Great Commandment. Jesus said, “The most important one [commandment] is this: ‘…Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’ The second is this: ‘Love your neighbour as yourself.’….” (Mk 12:29-31). The church is called to love God and people. If our purpose does not lead us to love God and people then there must be something amiss with our purpose. It cannot be God’s purpose. If making disciples is the church’s primary objective; love is the church’s primary motive in all that we do.
Most churches would say that their mission is guided by Jesus’ Great Commission, “All authority in heaven and earth has been given to me. Therefore, go and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything that I’ve commanded you.” (Mt 28:18-20). It is impossible, however, for any one local church to make disciples of all the nations of the world. That is simply the general commission to churches everywhere by which each church is to determine its specific calling about the “where?”, the “whom?” and the “how?”; and maybe even the “when?”.
Needs alone, however, cannot define the calling of your church. For the simple reason, there are so many needs out there; even just within the community where your church is located. So, how do we determine what needs the Lord is calling us to meet?